Growth Potential (Universe)
What it shows
A ranking of projects by a factor-based growth potential score (0–100) built from six market dimensions: momentum, trend, capital flow, network activity, cycle phase and distance from the mean. It is an analytical, educational factor ranking, not a price forecast or investment advice.
How to read it
First check the market regime. In a risk-off regime even high scores are less reliable. Then look for projects in the green zone (80–100) with high coverage, and expand a row to see which factors drive the score. A high score from one dominant factor is less robust than one spread across several. This is a factor ranking for analysis, NEVER a buy/sell signal.
Parameters
- Potential score (0–100)
- An aggregate score from six factors. The color shows the zone: cool blue = low (0–20), violet = mid (40–60), vivid green = high (80–100).
- Positive reading: 80–100 (green): many growth factors aligned favorably at once.
- Negative reading: 0–20 (blue): weak or opposing factors; a historically unsupportive backdrop.
- Neutral reading: 40–60 (violet): a mixed picture with no clear factor edge.
- Factors
- Expand a row to see each factor's contribution: Momentum, Trend, Smart money, Network, Cycle, Distance. Positive values (green) lift the score, negative (red) drag it down.
- Market regime
- The overall market backdrop: risk-on (green), risk-off (red) or neutral (amber). The same score means more in a risk-on regime.
- Coverage (%)
- How many of the six factors had complete data. Low coverage = a score built on partial information, treat with caution.
Example
A project scoring 92 (green) in a risk-on regime, with 100% coverage and positive Momentum, Trend and Smart money contributions is a coherent high-potential factor picture. A score of 88 driven by a single factor at 40% coverage is far less reliable.